NIS2 & DORA: Why Compliance Velocity Is Becoming the New KPI for Protecting Global Revenue

In 2026, European regulators measure execution, not paperwork—under NIS2 and DORA, compliance is proven by how fast you can detect, contain, and recover from an attack in real time, making cybersecurity a condition of doing business for any company tied to Europe’s financial and industrial ecosystem; if you cannot demonstrate control and resilience on demand, you are commercially exposed, which is why a new metric now matters: Compliance Velocity, the speed at which you can enforce security and prove it when the audit starts.

Team Genians

January 10, 2026

The 2026 Reality: The Year of the Supervisory Audit

As we move through 2026, the focus has shifted from implementation to supervision and enforcement. Across the continent, enforcement and supervisory audits are intensifying. Regulators are no longer asking for “plans” or “intentions.”
In this landscape, the era of “Paper Compliance“—security policies that exist only in binders—has effectively ended. Global regulators and enterprise partners now look past documentation to measure your Compliance Velocity: the tangible speed at which your organization can execute security policies and prove resilience in real-time.

The Regulatory Squeeze: NIS2 and the Real Power of DORA

The financial and operational stakes of non-compliance have reached a critical threshold. It is vital to understand the distinct pressures these frameworks apply:

  • NIS2 (Network and Information Security Directive): For essential and important entities, the risk is a penalty cap of up to 2% of total global annual turnover.
  • DORA (Digital Operational Resilience Act): DORA grants financial supervisors the power to impose significant corrective and enforcement actions when operational resilience is lacking. This includes measures that can directly impact management continuity and impose strict operational mandates.

Whether it is a turnover-based fine or a supervisory intervention that disrupts management, the cost of “technical slowness” is a primary business risk.

The Supply Chain Mandate: Managing Unacceptable Risk

A common misconception is that these regulations only affect EU-headquartered firms. In reality, the Supply Chain acts as the primary enforcement bridge.

Under the new mandates, EU-based organizations are legally required to ensure their suppliers do not expose them to unacceptable cyber risk. In practice, this forces enterprise leaders to replace non-compliant vendors with those who can prove superior resilience. In 2026, your Compliance Velocity is your primary credential for global trade.

Defining ‘Compliance Velocity’: The Foundation of Operational Sovereignty

To navigate this environment, organizations must adopt a new KPI: Compliance Velocity.

Compliance Velocity is the measurable speed at which your organization identifies a threat, executes a defensive policy, and restores operations to remain in a compliant state.

High Compliance Velocity achieves Operational Sovereignty—the ability for a business to maintain total control and regulatory integrity over its digital environment, regardless of the external threat landscape.

The Gatekeepers: NAC & ZTNA as the ‘Execution Layer’

Audit success now hinges on proving automated control. This is where the network layer serves as the “Execution Layer” for your Compliance Velocity:

  • Genian NAC (Visibility & Isolation): Supports technical compliance by providing a real-time, automated inventory of every IT, OT, and IoT device. It enables the immediate, physical isolation of non-compliant devices.
  • Genian ZTNA (Identity-Based Trust): Aligns with NIS2 and DORA’s access control mandates by enforcing ‘Least Privilege.’ It ensures that access is granted only to specific applications based on real-time health checks of the device and identity.

The Survival Engine: Genian Insights E (Unified Endpoint Platform)

DORA demands Operational Resilience—the technical ability to withstand and recover. Genian Insights E delivers this through endpoint execution powered by EDR, integrated into a single, lightweight agent that consolidates critical defenses:

1. Consolidate to Accelerate (AV + EDR)

By merging signature-based remediation with behavior-based hunting (XBA), it reduces ‘agent fatigue’ while providing the comprehensive visibility required by modern auditors.

2. Supporting Resilience (Anti-Ransom)

Aligning with DORA’s recovery framework, Genian Insights E provides real-time file backup and automated restoration. This provides the technical evidence that your business can survive and recover from a ransomware event, supporting business continuity mandates.

3. Closing the Physical Gap (Device Control)

It enables the protection of sensitive data by managing unauthorized USB and external drives—addressing critical ‘Insider Threat’ and supply chain risk requirements.

Traditional Audit vs. The Compliance Velocity Audit

Audit FocusTraditional “Paper” ApproachCompliance Velocity Approach (Genians)
Asset Control“Show me your asset list.”NAC provides a real-time, automated audit trail.
Access Policy“Who has access to the VPN?”ZTNA proves app-level access based on real-time risk.
Resilience“What is your recovery plan?”EDR demonstrates automated file restoration logs.

Conclusion: A Strategic Edge for the Ready

For the unprepared, the NIS2 and DORA onslaught is a revenue catastrophe. But for those who embrace Compliance Velocity, it is a strategic advantage.
By building an Execution Layer that supports and enables these rigorous standards, you aren’t just avoiding sanctions—you are establishing Operational Sovereignty and proving your resilience to the global market.
Is your Compliance Velocity fast enough to protect your global revenue? The clock is ticking.

Appendix: Technical Alignment for Regulatory Compliance

To assist Legal and Compliance teams in their evaluation, the following table maps Genians’ technical capabilities to specific requirements within the NIS2 and DORA frameworks.

Regulation & ArticleWhat the Law RequiresGenians ControlWhat It Technically EnforcesAudit Evidence Produced
NIS2 Art. 21(2a) Risk ManagementOrganizations must manage cyber risk across all ICT assetsGenian NACReal-time inventory of every IT, OT, IoT deviceDevice inventory, connection history
NIS2 Art. 21(2b) Access ControlOnly authorized users and devices may access systemsGenian ZTNAIdentity + device-health based application accessApp-level access logs
NIS2 Art. 21(2c) Asset ManagementAssets must be known and controlledGenian NACDetects unmanaged or rogue devicesUnknown-device detection records
NIS2 Art. 21(2d) Incident HandlingIncidents must be detected, contained, and mitigatedInsights E + NACDetects endpoint threats and isolates infected systemsDetection alerts, quarantine logs
NIS2 Art. 21(2e) Business ContinuityServices must survive cyber disruptionInsights E Anti-RansomAuto-backup and restore of files after attackRestore logs, recovery timestamps
NIS2 Art. 21(2f) Supply Chain SecuritySuppliers must not introduce unacceptable riskNAC + ZTNA (Vendor Devices)Identifies and restricts all partner and contractor devicesVendor device compliance records
NIS2 Art. 23 AccountabilityControls must be demonstrableUnified Genians LogsCorrelated asset, access, and response evidenceCross-layer audit trail
DORA Art. 12(1) ICT Risk ControlsFirms must apply technical ICT risk controlsNAC + ZTNA + EDREnforces device, identity, and endpoint securitySystem control logs
DORA Art. 12(2) Resilience & RecoverySystems must withstand and recover from incidentsInsights E Anti-RansomLive backup + automated file restorationRecovery reports
DORA Art. 12(2) ContainmentAttacks must be technically containedNAC + ZTNALateral movement blocked, devices isolatedIsolation records
DORA Art. 12(3) Data ProtectionData integrity and confidentiality must be preservedDevice Control + BackupBlocks USB exfiltration, restores corrupted filesUSB block logs, backup snapshots
DORA Art. 12(4) Third-Party ICT RiskICT suppliers must be controlledNAC + ZTNAAll vendor access identified and restrictedPartner access logs
DORA Art. 12(5) Detection & ResponseFirms must detect and respond to ICT incidentsInsights E (EDR)Endpoint threat detection and responseIncident response logs
DORA Art. 12(6) Evidence of RecoveryFirms must prove recovery capabilityInsights E Restore LogsShows successful restoration after attackRecovery timestamps, file hashes
DORA Art. 12(7) AuditabilityControls must be provable to supervisorsGenians Audit TrailCorrelated NAC, ZTNA, EDR logsSupervisory-grade evidence

    Blog

    Related Post

    For attackers, your first-quarter business schedule—budget approvals, org changes, regulatory deadlines—becomes a set of decision…
    AI excels at analysis and automation, but security failures occur at execution points. Security does…
    AI accelerates decisions and enables autonomy, but responsibility for outcomes still belongs to organizations. This…

    Get a personalized demo

    Ready to see Genian in action?

    See Genian in action with a customized demo. Discover how it enhances security and streamlines operations—tailored to your needs.

    We use cookies to help improve this website and enhance your browsing experience You can change your cookie settings at any time. • Privacy • Terms